Broken Buildings, Busted Budgets: How to Fix America's Trillion-Dollar Construction Industry | 
enlarge | Author: Barry B. Lepatner Publisher: University Of Chicago Press Category: Book
List Price: $17.00 Buy New: $10.46 You Save: $6.54 (38%)
New (29) Used (8) from $10.46
Rating: 12 reviews
Media: Paperback Edition: Reprint Pages: 240 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.7 Dimensions (in): 8.4 x 5.4 x 0.7
ISBN: 0226472698 Dewey Decimal Number: 624 EAN: 9780226472690
Publication Date: September 15, 2008 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: International shipping available Condition: Brand New, Perfect Condition, Please allow 4-14 business days for delivery. 100% Money Back Guarantee, Over 1,000,000 customers served.
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Across the nation, construction projects large and small—from hospitals to schools to simple home improvements—are spiraling out of control. Delays and cost overruns have come to seem “normal,” even as they drain our wallets and send our blood pressure skyrocketing. In Broken Buildings, Busted Budgets, prominent construction attorney Barry B. LePatner builds a powerful case for change in America’s sole remaining “mom and pop” industry—an industry that consumes $1.23 trillion and wastes at least $120 billion each year. With three decades of experience representing clients that include eminent architects and engineers, as well as corporations, institutions, and developers, LePatner has firsthand knowledge of the bad management, ineffective supervision, and insufficient investment in technology that plagues the risk-averse construction industry. In an engaging and direct style, he here pinpoints the issues that underlie the industry’s woes while providing practical tips for anyone in the business of building, including advice on the precise language owners should use during contract negotiations. Armed with Broken Buildings, Busted Budgets, everyone involved in the purchase or renovation of a building or any structure—from homeowners seeking to remodel to civic developers embarking on large-scale projects—has the information they need to change this antiquated industry, one project at a time. “LePatner describes what is wrong with the current system and suggests ways that architects can help—by retaking their rightful place as master builders.”—Fred A. Bernstein, Architect Magazine “Every now and then, a major construction project is completed on time and on budget. Everyone is amazed. . . . Barry LePatner thinks this exception should become the rule. . . . A swift kick to the construction industry.”—James R. Hagerty, Wall Street Journal
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 7 more reviews...
A must read book for engineers and students November 19, 2008 John J. White (Merritt Island, Florida) As one of the leading construction lawyers in the nation, Barry Le Patner doesn't necessarily expose the faults of the $1 trillion construction industry as much as he lays it out for public view. In writing this book he risks being labeled a pariah in the construction industry for biting the hand that feeds him. Of the $1.23 trillion spent on construction in the U.S. last year, La Patner points out the industry wastes $120 billion, enough money to set Social Security on the path to financial solvency. What's the root cause of the waste? La Patner emphasizes the two most hated words an owner hears from a general contractor: cost overruns and change orders. The mom and pop construction industry purposely bids low on a project to lock in a mutable contract. Once in hand, the contractor becomes a monopoly that can run roughshod over the owner with schedule delays and change orders that almost guarantee a large profit for the general contractor. This is why we see so many articles in newspapers about delays and huge overruns on projects. A recent example of this waste is the Big Dig in Boston. $12 billion over budget, years late, and it leaks. Mr. LaPatner's solution seems simple, fixed-price contracts and consolidation of the mom and pop small contractors into a larger corporation that will take responsibility for all the construction tasks. He also recommends an intermediary to oversee the project with the interests of the owner in mind, and not the contractor, This well-written, 200 plus page book will not threaten James Patterson's novels for domination at the beach next summer, but it may have the potential to influence public opinion of the wasteful construction industry just as Rachel Carson's book, Silent Spring influenced and kick-started the environmental movement. It's probably too late to change the ways and habits of the entrenched contemporary construction industry, but it's not too late to influence the minds of the future architects and engineers attending the nation's universities. This book should be required reading of those students who will someday steer the beleaguered industry.
Pretty Deficient October 27, 2008 Consultant (Northeast United States) Like others here have said - the book offers a promise but doesn't deliver. Ironically - much like the sub-standard contractors the author faults for all of the industry's problems. The book has serious deficiencies - it is questionable how much the authors really know about certain industry practices such as cost estimating, building information modeling (BIM)or Job Order Contracting (which is never mentioned). Some of their observations are simply anecdotal (despite an over-abundance of footnotes, like some academic text). They seem not to realize some of the circumstances that lead to the current configuration of the industry - such as specialized crafts and training required by contractors in order for owners to get manufacturer's warranties on certain products such as roofing. A general contractor can't keep people like that on the payroll all the time - it's just-in-time work, and a good deal of it is refurbishment, not new construction. Also, much of what the author faults the entire industry for are simply examples of bad management - on the part of architects, contractors and owners. Nothing new there. Then again - that's how the author makes his living - as an attorney in contract disputes. As another reviewer opined - he never sees the good projects. For example - the author lauds architect Frank Gehry and specifically the Strata Center at MIT. Apparently the book was written before MIT sued Gehry for the many flaws in the design of the $300 million Strata center (search the Boston Globe of November 6, 2007 for the full article.) Just because MIT paid Gehry $15 million - MIT expects a building that doesn't leak, have poor drainage and a host of other problems. The nerve! Here's another take on Gehry's Strata Center: "It really is a disaster," said former Boston University president John Silber, who sharply criticizes the Stata Center's design in a new book, "Architecture of the Absurd: How 'Genius' Disfigured a Practical Art." I was especially amused at how the authors tap-danced around the issue of how the construction industry in the US is supposedly deeply flawed, but leads all the others in the world in productivity! An interesting oxymoron that really isn't addressed. This book is a scan read, and library loan at best.
Could have been a good trade journal article, not enough substance for a book October 25, 2008 SewerGuy 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
I agree with several other reviewers, this book starts off strong then quickly fizzles into repetitiveness and too much "armchair economist" speculation. Contractors bid low to get the job then try to make it up on change orders. Therefore we should maybe try something different with contracts. Anyone who has been around construction for any length of time knows this. I take issue with his call for consolidation (and bureaucratization) in the industry. Do we really want foremen as lobotomized as Target Team Members? Construction today, while not an egalitarian workers paradise, is a place where a person with ambition can still rise to a decent standard of living with just their own hard work and wits. There are meritocratic elements, consensus decision making, and cooperation within the command structure. Why try to make it more like cubicle life? With regard to productivity, when delays (expected or unexpected) happen in a centralized office or diversified manufacturer, one can often switch to other productive task while waiting. On the job site you can wait drive somewhere else, with productive hours lost to transit and setup time. Perhaps some efficiencies can be gained but for instance what else do you have workers do when finishing concrete? They have to work the concrete a little bit, sit around in the truck, go back and work it a little more, wait in the truck, etc.
Busted expectations April 20, 2008 Building Bob (Mission Viejo, Ca) 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
A decent book and well written but it is thin on solutions and alternatives. Changing the construction contract is the theme of this book and the only relevant solution proposed.
Kept waiting for it to develop February 14, 2008 John Strather (Springfield, MO USA) 2 out of 4 found this review helpful
I was disappointed by this book. It started out very well, with a promise to unlock the mysteries of a horribly inefficient industry. Hoping to find a manifesto for change, I instead found the proposed solution quite underwhelming. The authors laboriously breakdown the current system in great detail, setting the stage and mentally preparing the reader for the great unveiling. And I kept waiting for that moment to come when the "ah-ha" would happen and everything would click into place. I had to double check that I was done when I reached the Notes section to make sure that there wasn't any more. "Is that it?" I thought. It does provide a fascinating look at the inner workings of the industry. It is a good read for anybody in the construction industry, whether as an owner, contractor, or design professional. The authors certainly do give you a lot to think about, but little promise that it can be adopted industry-wide. I recommend reading this book, but do not expect it to be world-changing.
|
|
|