|
Color of Night |  | Director: Richard Rush
Actors: Bruce Willis, Jane March, Rubén Blades, Lesley Ann Warren, Scott Bakula
Studio: Hollywood Pictures Home Video
Category: DVD
List Price: $9.99
Buy New: $4.94
as of 11/23/2009 00:32 CST details
You Save: $5.05 (51%)
New (33) Used (16) Collectible (1) from $3.91
Seller: -importcds
Rating:  90 reviews
Format: Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DVD, Letterboxed, Widescreen, NTSC
Languages: English (Original Language), French (Original Language)
Rating: R (Restricted)
Region: 1
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
DVD Layers: 1
DVD Sides: 1
Picture Format: Letterbox
Number Of Discs: 1
Running Time: 121 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 7.5 x 5.4 x 0.6
MPN: DISD17633D
ISBN: 0788816837
UPC: 071795100343
EAN: 9786305428480
Theatrical Release Date: August 19, 1994
Release Date: August 24, 1999
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com
Psychological twists and turns strangle the plot of this disappointing effort from the director of The Stunt Man, Richard Rush. Emotionally damaged psychiatrist Bruce Willis leaves his practice behind and moves to LA when a patient commits suicide in front of him. Out of the goodness of his broken heart, he takes over the practice of a murdered colleague (Scott Bakula). Jane March is the needy but mysterious woman who literally crashes into his life, making sexual advances the good doctor soon reciprocates. What March seems to need most, however, is underwear. The plot and the dialogue vacillate between silly and inane, leaving us with some so-so sex and overblown performances. This could explain why it was the winner of the 1995 Razzie Award for Worst Picture. If you want a more effective thriller that delves into damaged psyches, take another look at Alfred Hitchcock's Vertigo. --Rochelle O'Gorman
Product Description
Willis takes over a therapy group to learn who murdered his colleague and falls for a sexy patient int his fast-paced psychological trhiller. Studio: Buena Vista Home Video Release Date: 05/03/2005 Starring: Bruce Willis Jane March
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 90
 racist, sexist, homophobic, porngraphic, abusive to the disabled September 23, 2009
Carol Hunt
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
This film is simple terrible and Bruce Willis and Jane March ought to have made a public apology for being ignorant enough to star in a film scripted to offend almost all minorities.
Let's analyze this film using several lens.
1) Race
The only minority character's are given degrading roles. The first racial minority in the script is an Arab taxi driver who gets pleasure out of people suffering in car crashes. He gleefully exclaims that there might be a fatal crash! The scene was embarrassing. Why wasn't the taxi driver Caucasian or better yet not in the film at all? This same scene reflects the writers prejudice attitudes toward different social classes--a repeated theme throughout the film.
Likewise, we are presented with the black cop. Film after film after film we see that the only role for blacks is in the police department. Our black cop is a weak man who will put up with degradation from his Spanish superior because he desperately wants to keep his low end job. He has few ambitions and is portrayed as the rightful minority who is being burdened by competition from a Hispanic rival. In other words, the black is the "good minority" being forced out of his rightful position as dutiful side kick to Willis. We understand that he should really be police chief, but because of the awful Hispanic man he is not. This film creates the dynamic in which oppressed people are scripted to fight among themselves rather than working together for a common good. It is the ultimate in racist portrayal.
If that wasn't stated clearly enough, the police chief is a Hispanic man who is offensive, incompetent, mean, and mischievous. He is the Disney "chihuahua" rerolled for an adult film. He is there for the audience to laugh at. He has few morals--can't get the job done with ethics, and rarely works at all. Willis is shown in numerous scenes doing the job of the police as a psychologist. Willis interviews witnesses and ultimately solves the mystery despite the rude pugnacious help from the Hispanic police chief. I have never seen a modern movie that was this racist before or ridiculous. The police do no work at all and they do not even protect the murder victim before he is murdered. The police allow him to be killed claiming that they cannot possible protect all the therapists who have stalkers. Add another quality to the film--it has an abusive depiction of police officers as being bubbling racial inferior human beings that are apathetic.
2.) Combine racism with sexism and you will get to the next dilemma. Jane March plays a character that looks like she has a mixed racial heritage. She is "not as she seems." Again, we get the racial minority that cannot really be trusted. By the end of the film Willis ultimately saves her from a life of abuse worse than anything we can possibly imagine. It is a filthy rewrite of Pygmalion with Willis as a kind of psychological Henry Higgins who is going to remake the dependent maiden because he is such an awesome guy. Willis is presented to the audience as the only norm. He is white and male and in charge of readopting a group of traumatized people to the norm (white maleness). All the therapists in this film are white males. The film insidiously promotes a type of modern colonization where only a white male is considered normal. Fortunately he is such an awesome man that he is trying to save everyone out of his personal goodness.
3.) Every depiction is pitiful, however, the disabled get the worst portrayal of all. In one seen Willis makes fun of a schizophrenic patient. It is hard to be ignorant enough to find mocking someone with a brain disease socially acceptable. How would Willis feel is if he was someone suffering from a mental illness and watching his film? Again, I cannot believe that anyone would willing read the lines that they are given. All the patients are portrayed awfully. They attack each other in their support group, some are violent, and other intentionally badly behaved. Three are extremely sexually inappropriate and all discourteous to each other and Willis. It does not reflect people who seek counseling and it is an extremely abusive portrayal. The audience is meant to make fun of them, call them names, and degrade them much like the rich in the 1700's would go to the asylum to laugh at the suffering people. It is cruel.
4.) The film is blatantly homophobic. In one scene a bi-sexual sex addict exclaims that she wishes her girlfriend was a man. The film had the opportunity to present homosexual relationships as part of normal human sexual function. It does not. It depicts the lesbian character as extremely sick and sexually depraved. She will sleep with anyone. I do not think that it can be over stated how damaging this film is to women and to homosexuals. In one line the author asserts that a woman could never really actually want to be a lesbian and must really want a man (penis). The lesbian character is only complete if she is in a heterosexual relationship and barring that she is tormented.
The only positive that I see in this film is that Willis takes responsibility for being older than his sex partner and shows concern for her well being with in the movie; he doesn't abandon her as just a sex toy or promote a sexual double standard. However, the reality contradicts the message of the film. The movie is soft core pornography and Willis and March are really having intercourse during the sex scene. Willis is aroused (you will actually see his penis)and the scenes are so graphic and intimate that the two are making love. That was a little bit stunning, but had the movie been worthy of watching it could have been viewed as a kind of political statement questioning contemporary morality. This film is not making any great points--it is just trying to keep your attention by showing Willis pounding on his 21 year old co-star (literally). At the time of release, Willis was 39 years old and 18 years older than the young woman he is making love with. It is questionably ethical. He is an authority figure, but he makes love to this girl all over TV.
The final point I would like to make is that Willis is portrayed as an authority figure. The movie brainwashes young girls into believe that it is safe to engage is sexual relationships with older men who have a much higher status an ability to exercise power than themselves. The relationship model is one in which the male protects the younger woman, bending over backwards to help her. This is extremely troubling because in reality few men are going to live up to the bill and it reasserts patriarchy in a way that could damage impressionable young women. The message can be viewed as such "you need a man and an older man will help you if you are vulnerable". I cannot see how this could ever get 5 stars. I think F sums it up.
 Movie Review September 11, 2009
Kevin Hemminger
Great video that I purchased to replace my VHS copy since my vcr died on me. I would definitely buy from this seller again in the future.
Good thriller with Bruce Willis and an all star cast August 16, 2009
Bracken J. Deatherage (Kennewick, WA USA)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Good psychological thriller that will keep you guessing throughout the movie. Due to some sexual content, probably not a movie for middle schoolers or younger. If you are a fan of Bruce Willis, Jane March, Scott Bakula, or Leslie Ann Warren, it is the film for you!
Soft-core Porn with an overused plot June 2, 2009
J. R. Tees
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
The best thing about this movie is the various sex scenes. The plot is painfully obvious and has been used and reused various times prior to the release of this particular movie. The director and producers clearly wanted to produce a fully pornographic movie with A and B-list actors, but for whatever reason were unable to fully commit to doing it that way.
The movie is a good soft-core porno if you take it as one, however if you expect anything more you might be disappointed.
 it pretty good January 12, 2009
David T. Scanlon
1 out of 3 found this review helpful
a good who done it/thriller movie. there is extreme sex in this film which places it in an nc-17 rating. u get to see some violence, thrills, action sequence, people who have problems, a jackass detective, male and female nudity. its also recommended if u want to see bruce willis cock.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 90
|
|
|
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME. Thanks for shopping with us! | |
